New McKinsey Data Shows The CMOs Winning With AI Are The Ones Who Invest In Brand First
McKinsey found that CMOs are winning with AI, but very few can demonstrate ROI on more than half of their marketing spend.

McKinsey's State of Marketing Europe 2026 report surveyed 500 senior marketing leaders across five major European markets and found that branding is the number one priority for CMOs in 2026. Not performance marketing. Not martech. Not generative AI. Brand. Generative AI ranked 17th out of 20. For anyone who has led brand and fought the uphill battle of justifying long-term investment against short-term performance pressure, this is a significant data point. But the headline "brand beats AI" misses the real story.
Trust or bust: The top five CMO priorities are branding, budget management, data privacy, authenticity, and employer branding. Four of those five are about trust. AI-generated content has flooded every channel, and differentiation through volume is no longer possible when every competitor can produce the same output at the same speed. What cuts through now is meaning, consistency, and a brand that stands for something credible over time. The brand role is shifting from functional benefits to emotional relevance and trust. 72% of CMOs plan to increase their marketing budgets in 2026, and the top investment areas are creativity, value perception, and innovation. Those are brand-building activities, not performance marketing line items.
AI's not benched, it's batting second: Most people see AI at 17th and conclude CMOs have written it off. That's not what's happening. 94% of European marketing organizations haven't made significant progress with AI maturity, but the 6% that have are seeing 22% efficiency gains and reinvesting them into growth. The issue isn't belief, it's sequencing. Until you have a brand strategy worth amplifying, AI just makes mediocre work faster. I've seen this firsthand. Companies that adopted AI before they had clear positioning produced content that was prolific and perfectly generic. They didn't have a brand problem before AI. They had a brand problem that AI made visible. The companies winning with AI had something worth scaling before they ever turned it on.
McKinsey also found that very few CMOs can demonstrate ROI on more than half of their marketing spend. That sounds like a weakness, but it reinforces the point. Brand measurement is still immature, but CMOs are investing anyway because the strategic logic is clear even when the attribution isn't.
New math for the money people: The old argument for brand was soft. Awareness creates preference and preference drives revenue, but the timeline was long and the attribution was fuzzy. The new argument is structural. AI-mediated search and LLM-driven buyer research are compressing the funnel. Buyers form shortlists before they ever talk to a sales team, and the brands that show up in those shortlists—the ones that LLMs recommend and that buyers already trust when they start the purchase process—are the ones that win. Those brands aren't built through paid channels. They're built through sustained brand investment that makes acquisition cheaper, content more credible, sales conversations shorter, and AI-generated citations more likely. Brand isn't a separate budget line. It's the operating system that makes every other channel perform better.
Authenticity has a credibility problem: Authenticity ranks fourth on the CMO priority list, but it's become one of the most misused words in marketing. Most companies think it means loosening up their tone on social or putting employees in front of the camera. That's voice, not authenticity. Real authenticity is the gap between what a brand promises and what it actually delivers being as close to zero as possible. Buyers don't judge it based on messaging. They judge it based on whether the website matches the sales conversation, whether the thought leadership matches the product capabilities, and whether the employer brand matches the experience of working there. The brands that get this right treat it as an operational discipline, not a content exercise. That's a leadership problem, and it belongs in the C-suite.
Brand has always been the most powerful lever in marketing, but it was never actually displaced by performance marketing or martech or AI. It was defunded by teams that found quarterly metrics easier to report even when they were harder to sustain. The CMOs who ranked brand as their top priority in this report aren't being nostalgic. They're making a practical bet that when execution gets cheaper every year and standing out gets harder, brand is the one investment that compounds. The question for every marketing leader reading this is whether to build the systems and measurement that make brand a lasting advantage now, or wait until the case is even more obvious and the window is smaller.



